Friday the 13th was a lucky day for the State Library of Pennsylvania. Maybe.
This was the day that a longer print version of Charles Thompson's article appeared in the Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Patriot-News. It came out under the headline: "
Most State Library jobs could be history; Rendell's proposal would cut 50 of 57 positions, force 'rethinking' of role."
The core of the article appeared Thursday evening in an online version. This version of the article included quotes from several library patrons.
In this version of the article, Thompson opens with:
"The State Library could lose nearly all of its staff under Gov. Ed Rendell's proposed budget for 2009-10, and the proposed cuts are startling researchers who rely on the library.
"Fifty of the library's 57 positions would be eliminated, with one person transferred elsewhere in the state Department of Education, which oversees the library.
"That would leave a staff of six, presumably to maintain public access to the facility, which the administration has indicated it wants to try to keep open."
Mike Race, PDE press office spokesman, is again quoted with his 'hey, it probably won't be all that bad' official position.
Then Thompson continues:
"The State Library houses an extensive general and legal reference collection and is perhaps the state's leading repository of Pennsylvania and U.S. government reports, from election results to postings of salaries of all state employees.
"It also contains a state-of-the-art rare-books room that preserves a collection of books and newspapers started by Benjamin Franklin.
"Supporters of the library said it plays an important role during a recession as people without computers flood in to apply for jobs online. At lunchtime Thursday, the banks of public computer terminals were nearly full.
"Like proposed shutdowns of the Scotland School for Veterans' Children in Franklin County or the Governor's Schools summer enrichment programs, this proposed deep cut is causing deep concern with devotees.
"Joyce Barnhart, an amateur genealogist from East Pennsboro Twp., said the State Library can't be beaten for its breadth of research material and access to it."
While the existence of a "state-of-the-art" rare book room is questionable (it has never been open for the public's use, and half of the books are still in the old location with its window air conditioners and unfiltered air), it certainly IS true that library users, especially the genealogists, will lose out when the governor's budget cuts go into effect.
Tha article continues with more comments from genealogists, and then this remark (that sounds like it comes from the governor's press office):
"Rendell has said he is unhappy about many of his hundreds of proposed budget cuts and that he hopes for restorations of many funding lines when better times return. But he said he is focused on preserving public safety, social services and education."
Oh, yeah, real focused on education . . . as long as it isn't being done in or through a library!
The article included the obligatory "we aren't allowed to say anything" quotes from Library staffers:
"Workers at the library would not comment about their situation Thursday, saying they were advised by their supervisors to refer all questions to the Education Department press office."
(Bet you get praised for that later! Unfortunately, the press office will again say something like 'Oh, everything's fine. We support the governor and his budget.')
The article wraps up by quoting Glenn Miller of the PaLA (Pennsylvania Library Association). He's one of the "State Library advocates" who are, according to the article, vowing to fight for the Library. At this point, however, their fighting has been invisible to the library workers whose jobs are on the line. Why haven't they made it clear to State Library staff that PaLA is making a LOT of noise about this, and won't stand for it?